<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Some thoughts on @Danielbru&#039;s screw up &amp; @arrington&#039;s response</title>
	<atom:link href="http://calacanis.com/2010/02/05/some-thoughts-on-danielbrus-screw-up-arringtons-response/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://calacanis.com/2010/02/05/some-thoughts-on-danielbrus-screw-up-arringtons-response/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Nov 2010 14:11:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin</title>
		<link>http://calacanis.com/2010/02/05/some-thoughts-on-danielbrus-screw-up-arringtons-response/#comment-5829</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 19:00:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calacanis.wordpress.com/2010/02/05/some-thoughts-on-danielbrus-screw-up-arringtons-response/#comment-5829</guid>
		<description>i had a feeling it was that guy, he seems kinda shady.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i had a feeling it was that guy, he seems kinda shady.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Koetsier</title>
		<link>http://calacanis.com/2010/02/05/some-thoughts-on-danielbrus-screw-up-arringtons-response/#comment-5827</link>
		<dc:creator>John Koetsier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 18:41:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calacanis.wordpress.com/2010/02/05/some-thoughts-on-danielbrus-screw-up-arringtons-response/#comment-5827</guid>
		<description>People are people ... all of us make mistakes, and all of us do things that are wrong.

But Michael has done the right thing here ... and that&#039;s the key:
setting up systems so that when the inevitable happens, there are ways to track
and identify and resolve issues.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People are people &#8230; all of us make mistakes, and all of us do things that are wrong.</p>
<p>But Michael has done the right thing here &#8230; and that&#8217;s the key:<br />
setting up systems so that when the inevitable happens, there are ways to track<br />
and identify and resolve issues.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred Grott</title>
		<link>http://calacanis.com/2010/02/05/some-thoughts-on-danielbrus-screw-up-arringtons-response/#comment-5824</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred Grott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 18:11:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calacanis.wordpress.com/2010/02/05/some-thoughts-on-danielbrus-screw-up-arringtons-response/#comment-5824</guid>
		<description>Sorry Jason I disagree its a larger symptom of a culture of lying and denial within the tech and startup industries..

Transparency in exposing an extortion is to out both parties to that extortion not just
one..

We cannot rescue a country out of recession if the startups and coverage is base don circle jerk moves rather than transparency and honesty..because its that truth currency that allows consumers etc to spend again thus triggering a recovery.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry Jason I disagree its a larger symptom of a culture of lying and denial within the tech and startup industries..</p>
<p>Transparency in exposing an extortion is to out both parties to that extortion not just<br />
one..</p>
<p>We cannot rescue a country out of recession if the startups and coverage is base don circle jerk moves rather than transparency and honesty..because its that truth currency that allows consumers etc to spend again thus triggering a recovery.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: k</title>
		<link>http://calacanis.com/2010/02/05/some-thoughts-on-danielbrus-screw-up-arringtons-response/#comment-5819</link>
		<dc:creator>k</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 17:48:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calacanis.wordpress.com/2010/02/05/some-thoughts-on-danielbrus-screw-up-arringtons-response/#comment-5819</guid>
		<description>Double your money and make it stack ...

Unfortunately it&#039;s not just young people who do stuff like this.
I&#039;ve seen it a few times and they don&#039;t seem to learn, they just move on to the next one.
This may not be the case here because it&#039;s very public.
But they move on to another industry.

Techcrunch handled this very good.
They removed the companies who are into this BS.
It&#039;s not 100%  transparancy when you don&#039;t reveal their names.
But it wouldn&#039;t be fair to the founders of those comps.
Let&#039;s save that conversation for Twist.


On to the next  one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Double your money and make it stack &#8230;</p>
<p>Unfortunately it&#8217;s not just young people who do stuff like this.<br />
I&#8217;ve seen it a few times and they don&#8217;t seem to learn, they just move on to the next one.<br />
This may not be the case here because it&#8217;s very public.<br />
But they move on to another industry.</p>
<p>Techcrunch handled this very good.<br />
They removed the companies who are into this BS.<br />
It&#8217;s not 100%  transparancy when you don&#8217;t reveal their names.<br />
But it wouldn&#8217;t be fair to the founders of those comps.<br />
Let&#8217;s save that conversation for Twist.</p>
<p>On to the next  one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris P.</title>
		<link>http://calacanis.com/2010/02/05/some-thoughts-on-danielbrus-screw-up-arringtons-response/#comment-5818</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris P.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 17:32:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calacanis.wordpress.com/2010/02/05/some-thoughts-on-danielbrus-screw-up-arringtons-response/#comment-5818</guid>
		<description>What about Mike removing all of Daniel&#039;s posts on Techcrunch? Some are saying that breaks FTC rules. Why not put up a disclaimer instead of destroying all evidence and wishing it would go away?

For a tech news site there&#039;s way too much drama going on. The CrunchPad and now this. The common dominator in all of this is Mike himself.

It&#039;s going to be hard to trust future info from Techcrunch.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about Mike removing all of Daniel&#8217;s posts on Techcrunch? Some are saying that breaks FTC rules. Why not put up a disclaimer instead of destroying all evidence and wishing it would go away?</p>
<p>For a tech news site there&#8217;s way too much drama going on. The CrunchPad and now this. The common dominator in all of this is Mike himself.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s going to be hard to trust future info from Techcrunch.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

