John Evans has written some really intelligent points about my linkbaiting rules post… he is also the first person to blog about it, which means he is really quick in addition to being smart. I wonder who the first ten people to blog about this post will be?

#2: Vaspers the Grate–I blog I read all the time–also has some really interesting thoughts on linkbaiting.

#3: One of my old Netscape team members Chris Finke–who’s a clever guy if there ever was one–checks in on the linkbaiting story of the century. Well played Chris.

#4: CCChapman is a podcasting wizard who a lot of folks I know love and respect… he has some very considered thoughts on the new linkbaiting rules.

#5: Our first non-english blog checks in… very cool! I have no idea what they are saying about the link baiting rules, but at least we know they ARE talking about the rules.

#6: This is kind of cool: a PR person who I must have known back in the Silicon Alley days says he really digs my new rules, and he explains why you should too. Smart fellow.

#7: This link baiting rules post is now… AWARD WINNING!!! Thank you… you like me, you really, really link like me!

#8: Ummmm…. I think this dude is… ummm… like Dutch?

#9: Link Biter badges are now available–add them to you post and get an extra special nice comment back about a) how intelligent you are, b) how good looking you are, or c) how cool your twitter name is (note: this program can not be combined with other Link Baiting offers, valid in 47 states).

#10: Think Search Engines... very, very interesting thoughts and ideas on link baiting.

#11: PicktheBrain is now in my RSS reader–and it should be in yours. This is one smart cat!

#12: I love texas, and this Texas blog too!

#13: A comicstrip(blogger) says it all!

#14: This blogger put off getting beer with his wife to check in on the LinkBaiting rules…. that rulez!!!

#15: ohhhh… Johnny T. you thrill me!!! You’re a handsome guy, and I like that Twitter badge too!

#16: Dave Winer publishes his Link Bait Rules!! I love it… the first person to extend the idea, and Dave Winer’s big link bait rule? EXTEND THE IDEA!

#17: TechWinter takes a moment to make an OBVIOUS observations–and sometimes those are the only ones that matter huh?

#18: Some people can’t appreciate what TechWinter understands so clearly.

#19: MAthew Ingram refuses to take part in this very important post.

#20: Nick O’Neill extends my rules deftly… I think you’re in the zone Nick!

#21: Twitter-er Blone2.0 says….

#22: Twitster Rachel Cook says…

#23: FogView clears the… ummm… fog on link baiting rules

#24: PhakeCalacanis @ Twitter goes crazy…. the layers are folding in on themselves–time starts to slow.

#25: Another Twit-tastic post…

#26: Another day, another TechMeme thread… live of a hustler, live of a baiter.

#27: This is the best photo a blogger has found of me yet… well done. Not only did you pick the best photo it’s clear your blog and ideas are the best!!!

#28: Proust anyone??!?!?!!?!

#29: Best post of the day…. well duh!?!??

#30: Who will direct my life story…. here’s one bloggers wish list!

#31: Wag that dog baby… wag it.

#32: LastPodcast sums it up.

#33: First person smart enough to syndicate a PodTech/Calacanis Podcast to their link bite!

#34: Ben calls BS on BAIT… no link for you! OK… here’s a link anyway.

#35: CyberGrrrrrrrl checks in….

#36: Outside the BeltWay checks in….

#37: Barry blog breaks it down… nice design dude!!!

#38: Ted Murphy thinks he’s the fish…. but we all know he’s the bait. (great photo)

#39: LastExit checks in…

#40: This guy wants to start his own party…. but he’ll come to ours for now.

#41:kmull loves the idea…

#42: One of my kickboxing students checks in…

#43: The cartoons continue… why no video?!

#44: The Wolf is crying like a baby… ok, ok… here’s your link! whhaaaaaaaaaaaaa

#45: Brad Hill in the house…. yo.

#46: Wow… there are a lot of freaks out there.

#47: FIVE HAMS!!!!! I love it—and a bonus photoshop!

#48: Monkey boy links in…

#49: Danny Sullivan beats me down on the Daily Search Cast for his link… my bad baby!

#50:

COME ON PEOPLE ARE WE GONNA BREAK 50 today or what?!?!?!

#?: Scoble???
#?: Bruce Clay??
#?: Fred Wilson??
#?: Mike Arrington??
#?: Jeff Jarvis??
#?: Brian Alvey??
#?: Nick Denton??
#?: Valleywag??
#?: Techmeme??
#?: Netscape??
#?: Phil Kaplan/PUD/AdBrite
#?: Steve Gillmor
#?: Adam Curry
#?: Comic Strip Blogger
#?: Brad Hill
#?: Judith Meskill
#?: Ryan Block
#?: Peter Rojas

Ummm… Kara, uhh…. how do you really feel about Yahoo!??!!?

My favorite part:

• Speaking of acquisitions, go back and give that Mark Zuckerberg the love and $1 billion he wants. Facebook needs to hook up with a big player and fast, because despite its hypergrowth, its advertising ambitions are still hard to reach (even though a few ex-Yahoos are running the show in that department). They need help.

The allthingsd.com blog is gonna be in the Technorati 100 within six months–you heard it here first.

I’ve developed some deep relationships over the past couple of years blogging and I realize that those relationships manifest themselves in the links I find when I do my 28x a daily ego search over at Technorati. The quickest way to develop a relationship with me isn’t to twitter me, call me, email me, or skype me. Heck, even posting a comment here–the second best way to develop a relationship with me–is weak when compared to the power of the link.

If someone writes anything about me or links to this blog I find out about it instantly with my various RSS alerts, Technorati, Google blog search, Bloglines, etc.

Some folks have figured this out and they get on my radar by writing a critical piece. That’s a savvy move–to a point. I’d like to outline the best way to link bait a person like me:

a) write a blog post where the first paragraph is dedicated to a short bio of me. Most folks like to do this by saying “love him or hate him…” or “controversial blog boss.” That’s fine, just keep it short and score yourself bonus points by mentioning two or three of the following less mentioned facts: former Editor of Silicon Alley Reporter, “once profiled in New Yorker piece…,” former GM of Netscape, Brooklyn born, or “his trusty bulldog Toro by his side.” Those kind of obscure reference make me think that we have a deeper relationship and I’m more prone to comment and link to you.

b) DON’T start the post off flaming me. Start the post off by praising me, talking about how great Engadget or Netscape are, that you love my podcast, or that you thought I was a riot at some panel (you don’t even need to have been at the panel.. just technorati my name and “speaking at” and you can fake it). This kind of praise at the start of the post will draw me in. If you slam me right off the bat I’ll probably go into scan mode and just close the window in five seconds.

c) DO mention older posts I’ve done that you loved. A link to some piece from two years ago will spark my memory and make me think “oh, this is an old time reader!”

d) DO slam someone I don’t like or have had a beef with. This is a long list, but getting on my side will keep me reading your post and increase my chances of taking your link bait. So, “I agree 100% regarding his stance on payperpost” with a link to some post I did a year ago.

e) DO pick you favorite quote from one of my podcasts, or something I said on another persons blog. You don’t have to be blunt about this… say it in a slick way like “REmember what Jason says ‘no one likes to be deceived.. do you?’ ” That kind of stuff makes me link every time.

f) post a picture of me when I wasn’t fat. I’m not gonna link to some post where I look fat… come on. Use an old photo of me from like 2000 and you’re getting the link for sure!

g) DO lie and say we hung out one night back in the Silicon Alley days or after a conference and that I’m actually a really cool guy once you get to know me. Say that although I come off brash in my blog posts I’m really very engaging and fun to hang out with (most folks come to this conclusion–so I will fall for it).

h) If you are going to flame me do it in paragraph five but add something like “well, what the heck do I know anyway, but I think Jason might be wrong.” That kind of engaging stuff bring me in with the soft gloves on and I will gently try and convince you of my position–and give you a link!

i) do link to a Flickr photo of mine, a digg storyt about me, my linked in account, my myspace page, or my twitter page. This kind of full-court link press will get me excited and I will give you a link because I think “oh snap, this person reads my twitter and posted a comment over at PodTech.net? Gosh, I gotta give them a link back and join their discussion!”

If you follow this “Calacanis Link Bait” strategies I will link to you. If you just come out and beat me up I probably won’t… so, there you have it “how to get a link from Calacanis.”

[ BAD SEO PEOPLE: fire away! ]

I haven’t been fatblogging for a while now because I’m on the road and the three hotels I’ve been in don’t have a scale (yes, I’m staying at cheaper hotels–you guessed right).

In Spain I ate healthy, in France I went bread crazy, and now that I’m back in the US I’m getting focused again. Just got back from the gym at the W and burned some calories. Promise once I’m back home with the family I’ll jump on that scale and let you know how did! (I’m guess flat)

One thing I have been doing is walking a ton… in Spain, in France, and now in NYC. I also brought this low sugar protein bars and fiber bars with me on the trip and when I was stuck facing the room service menu I would pull one from my back pack and pair it with one of the apples I had laying around–voila, I’m less fat!

How is everyone else doing?!

This whole WIRED vs. Calacanis/Winer stand off has really developed into a very interesting debate on the future of news. It’s a discussion that, as Dave Winer said, is long over due and that we’ve been doing for long.

Jeff Jarvis does his standard 1,000+ word analysis of the events and what they mean–and he nails it. Dave Winer adds to the piece.

Journalism is about the search for truth, and much of live interviews is about “gotcha” journalism. Now, I’m not saying Fred is a gotcha journalist, but let’s face it, journalists are known for creating drama with quotes in order to build interest in their stories.

That drama creation has a real world effect on people and their relationships. My goal is to avoid the drama and get represented accurately–ok, well, maybe just the second part.

What this is really all about at the end of the day is that WIRED the print magazine–like other magazines and newspapers–are lost and adrift because they can’t break stories any more. WIRED is six weeks old when you open it, hundreds of people read my blog posts minutes after they come out. It’s impossible for print publications to have a “breaking news” role anymore, and they are certainly not going to be able to keep stories under wraps for six weeks when 90% of their subjects have blogs that are starved for content.

Media is becoming two way, and print media can’t keep up in a two way world.

I think that people may have underestimated exactly how dead print is as a NEWS carrier–and why.

Print is dead in the news role because it can’t keep up with the conversation–not because people don’t like print per say. For example, if Fred had his print story out within 12 hours of my discussions with him then he would at least be in the conversation–but weeks!??!! Come on!

Now, print magazines are going to stick around because they do analysis well, feature stories, profiles, and most of all fancy pictures that stroke people’s ego and sexy advertisements that make people with sexy product feel sexy about themselves.

I left print for a reason–it’s a dog, and an old one at that.* **

* Yes, I know print advertising is up year over year, and that WIRED is fat again and profitable (from what I hear). That’s great, but as a NEWS product print pubs are screwed. I think Chris Anderson has done an excellent job of making WIRED relevant for the things print can do: features, pictures, interviews, big thought pieces, etc.

** I love magazines. I love everything about them from the paper to design to the teamwork that goes into building them. However, as someone who’s worked in blogs, print, and email newsletters I can tell you that print is dog when it comes to breaking news… perhaps even just “news.”

One thing I hate is abusive pricing. Movie theaters charging $4.75 for .15 worth of Diet Coke, New York restaurants that charge $4 for an iced tea without free refills, hotels charging $8 for a tiny pot of coffee and charging you $7 to bring it to your room–you get the idea.

One of the things I love about Los Angeles when compared to New York City is that the people in Los Angeles won’t take abusive pricing. If you tried to charge people for a second, third, or even 10th iced tea they would read you the riot act. In New York City people are afraid to look cheap so they never say anything.

My belief is that the reason people get away with this kind of pricing is because people are not willing to say something. I think that people do predatory pricing because they can get away with it–when confronted they will stop, or at least be forced to explain themselves.

Today when I left the W Hotel in New York I hit the coffee bar in the lobby for an eight ounce cup of coffee. I thought they gave this for free to their customers (paying $400 a night), but they don’t. So, I went to pay for my eight ounces and the women told me $2.80 to which I told her “really?!” She said yes, I said “that’s abusive. That’s $1.30 more than Starbucks!” If you coffee is twice the price of Starbucks–the kings of abusive pricing–you’re really abusing people.

I left the coffee at the counter–after I had put in milk and sugar–in disgust. Come on W Hotel… be NICE to your customers, don’t abuse them.

What’s the most abusive pricing you’ve seen lately?

Consumerist should start an “abusive pricing” category to shame these people.

Special guest: Wired’s Fred Volgelstein

Hello everyone, Tyler here – back with an impromptu podcast for your listening pleasure (read: no video)

As promised, Jason speaks with Fred Vogelstein from Wired regarding the recent fuss over interviews by email, and the upcoming Wired piece on A-list bloggers highlighting Michael Arrington.

Additional mentions in this cast: Dave Winer, Peter Rojas, Chris Anderson, Nicholas Negroponte, and Nick Denton

download: audio [mp3]
subscribe: iTunes | audio
view: transcripts
contact: cast [at] calacanis.com

Wow, this whole interview standoff with WIRED got a ton of reaction–clearly we’ve hit a chord. As a result the WIRED journalist, Fred Vogelstein, has agreed to tape record the call and we will release it on the web.

So, we both get what we want:

• a) he gets the spontaneous interview
• b) I get 100% of my comments on the record and shared with my readers.

I think this may become my default position: any interviews with me will be recorded and published as part of CalacanisCast.

Thanks for the thoughtful comments everyone!

A WIRED journalist pinged me for some comments on Michael Arrington and his A-list blogger status. I told the journalist to send me the questions by email and he refused. He said Dave Winer did the same thing.

Journalists have been burning subjects for so long with paraphrased quotes, half quotes, and misquotes that I think a lot of folks (especially ones who don’t need the press) are taking an email only interview policy. (Mark Cuban did this long ago),

Here is the email I sent back to the journalist on my blackberry (I wonder what Chris Anderson if WIRED thinks of this issue since he is pushing the radical transparency thing).

—————————-

I’m an email guy like dave winer.. And I own my words as well, and often print them on my blog (after stories come out).

A wired writer who won’t do an email interview–thats ironic!

Frankly, you need to adapt. Journalists have misquoted people for so long–and quoted them out of context that many people like to have their words on record.

I don’t want someone taking half a sentence or paraphrasing me… Just too much risk.

Besides I have 10,000 people come to my blog every day–i don’t need wired to talk to the tech industry.

Also, this is exactly how I would have this to you on the phone… You may not get the exact tone of my voice–but you get my overall tone.

What’s really disturbing is that you would let two of the folks who know mike best walk away from the interview because you don’t like email–horrible for the reader. Also, your stance confirms for folks like me (and maybe dave) that doing email only is safer.

Feel free to print this…. I will probably make a blog post from it myself. There is no off the record and there never was. :

I post some photos over at Flickr… let’s hear your comments on the photos (over there, not here!)

http://www.flickr.com/photos/jasoncalacanis/