http://calacanis.com/2007/02/23/running-vs-walking-which-is-better/ Weblog by Jason Calacanis, formerly of Weblogs, Inc. and AOL. Fri, 20 Nov 2009 00:21:07 +0000 http://wordpress.com/ hourly 1 http://calacanis.com/2007/02/23/running-vs-walking-which-is-better/#comment-13311 danny boy Mon, 14 Sep 2009 14:56:37 +0000 http://calacanis.wordpress.com/2007/02/23/running-vs-walking-which-is-better/#comment-13311 its mostly miles covered.....in an hour a decent jogger/runner will cover 7 or more miles whereas most walkers will only go 3.5 miles or so...its approx same calories "per mile" walking versus running........ its mostly miles covered…..in an hour a decent jogger/runner will cover 7 or more miles whereas most walkers will only go 3.5 miles or so…its approx same calories “per mile” walking versus running……..

]]> http://calacanis.com/2007/02/23/running-vs-walking-which-is-better/#comment-2232 Lisa Tue, 20 Jan 2009 20:20:20 +0000 http://calacanis.wordpress.com/2007/02/23/running-vs-walking-which-is-better/#comment-2232 I'm researching this question for an article. I’m researching this question for an article.

]]> http://calacanis.com/2007/02/23/running-vs-walking-which-is-better/#comment-1207 MJJP Mon, 17 Nov 2008 00:50:11 +0000 http://calacanis.wordpress.com/2007/02/23/running-vs-walking-which-is-better/#comment-1207 I just want to comment on the issue of running vs walking. I have just come across several website that claim that running burns more calories than walking and to which I say hogwash. They try to state their case by comparing say 20 minutes of walking vs 20 minutes or running. Well no kidding, you are covering a greater distance running and therefor your feet are hitting the pavement way more times. However in retrospect I will say that walking may in fact burn more calories than running since you will probably use more steps in covering that mile. The only thing that running actually does is get your heart and lungs into a training mode for better conditioning and it does take less time to exercise. I just want to comment on the issue of running vs walking. I have just come across several website that claim that running burns more calories than walking and to which I say hogwash. They try to state their case by comparing say 20 minutes of walking vs 20 minutes or running. Well no kidding, you are covering a greater distance running and therefor your feet are hitting the pavement way more times. However in retrospect I will say that walking may in fact burn more calories than running since you will probably use more steps in covering that mile. The only thing that running actually does is get your heart and lungs into a training mode for better conditioning and it does take less time to exercise.

]]>